![]() ![]() It must be compiled without the “-enable-gpl" and “-enable-libx264” options. It allows FFmpeg usage with commercial software BUT with some very strict requirements. This is the simplest and most commercial friendly license for FFmpeg. For commercial applications there are basically 2 different licensing requirements, LGPL or GPL, depending on the options used during it’s compilation. I did some research on FFmpeg a couple of years ago for a commercial project so I’d like to offer some clarification about FFmpeg licensing as I understand it in very basic laymen’s terms (I’m not a lawyer). It a tough sell on your end as more and more users find alternatives. The issue I have is with the misinformation.Īgain, I totally understand why you get upset that there is a 60 dollar vms that can destroy any standalone NVR and has features and functions not available on 150 dollar per camera vms. See, you get all upset when I called him out, but have no problem with him making baseless claims. This is true for across all manufactures and was my position from day one. On my forum I make it a point that I hate liars. The gpl license does not require you to provide free use of the entire program you build FFMPEG into. Your implication that its for sale on our store and that is why I come to the developers defense falls flat on its face when you scroll UP and see that I did it well before the forum began selling the software. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |